What this product reference covers.
Food-grade lubricant is formulated and managed for a defined food-contact category while still meeting the mechanical requirements of the lubricated asset.
Products within the family.
Names used in commerce can overlap. Use the nominated standard and exact grade rather than relying on a generic product label.
H1 hydraulic oil
H1 hydraulic oil is a recognised food-grade lubricant category whose exact composition, grade limits and suitability must be confirmed from the governing specification and equipment requirement.
H1 gear oil
H1 gear oil is a recognised food-grade lubricant category whose exact composition, grade limits and suitability must be confirmed from the governing specification and equipment requirement rather than inferred from the generic label.
Food-grade compressor oil
Food-grade compressor oil is a recognised food-grade lubricant category whose exact composition, grade limits and suitability must be confirmed from the governing specification and equipment requirement rather than inferred from the generic label.
Food-grade grease
Food-grade grease is a recognised food-grade lubricant category whose exact composition, grade limits and suitability must be confirmed from the governing specification and equipment requirement rather than inferred from the generic label.
What the product is built from.
| Component | Technical role |
|---|---|
| Mineral, synthetic or renewable base fluid | Provides the principal lubricating film and viscosity-temperature foundation. |
| Anti-wear / extreme-pressure system | Protects loaded contacts where the application requires it. |
| Antioxidant and corrosion inhibitors | Control ageing, deposits and surface corrosion. |
| Application-specific additives | Tune detergency, friction, demulsibility, air release, tackiness or seal compatibility. |
Define the decision before selecting the panel.
- 01
Confirm new food-grade lubricant identity, grade and fitness for the intended application.
- 02
Detect contamination, degradation, mixing or storage-related change.
- 03
Investigate abnormal equipment, combustion, filtration or handling behaviour.
- 04
Establish a representative baseline for later comparison.
- 05
Support specification, maintenance and root-cause decisions with corroborated evidence.
What each result contributes.
“High” and “low” are directional investigation prompts, not pass/fail decisions. Corroborate them using the correct specification, baseline and companion evidence.
Open ASTM, ISO, IS/BIS, DIN and companion methods →| Test / parameter | Typical methods | Why it matters | Possible causes when high | Possible causes when low |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinematic viscosity | ASTM D445 / ISO 3104 | Confirms grade and detects dilution, shear, oxidation or mixing. | Oxidation, wrong oil, soot, evaporation or heavy contamination. | Shear, fuel/solvent dilution, wrong grade or lighter make-up oil. |
| Acid number | ASTM D664 | Trends acidic constituents, oxidation and contamination against a new-oil baseline. | Oxidation, overheating, acidic contamination or wrong fluid. | Fresh oil, make-up dilution or formulation difference. |
| Water | ASTM D6304 | Quantifies moisture relevant to corrosion, additive loss and film strength. | Condensation, cooler/seal leak, washdown, storage or sampling contamination. | Dry operation or dehydration; hot sampling can reduce free-water representation. |
| Elemental analysis | ASTM D5185 with PQ / ferrography where needed | Screens wear, contaminants and additive chemistry within method limitations. | Wear, corrosion, dirt, additive source, wrong oil or maintenance debris. | Stable wear, dilution, filtration or particles too large for ICP response. |
| FTIR condition | ASTM E2412 trending | Tracks oxidation and selected molecular contaminants against a comparable reference. | Heat, extended service, contamination or depleted antioxidant reserve. | Fresh oil, make-up dilution or a non-comparable baseline. |
| Particle count / cleanliness | ISO 11500; reporting to ISO 4406 | Quantifies solid-particle cleanliness where component clearances and servo reliability are sensitive. | Dirt ingress, active wear, ineffective filtration, maintenance debris or wrong sampling point. | Effective filtration or clean new oil; settling, dilution or non-representative sampling can under-report. |
| Copper corrosion | ASTM D130; ISO 2160 | Screens corrosivity toward copper-containing bearings, coolers, bushings and yellow-metal components. | Reactive sulfur, acidic degradation, contamination or formulation incompatibility; report uses a corrosion rating rather than concentration. | A low corrosion rating is favourable but does not rule out in-service copper wear. |
| Wear / load-carrying performance | ASTM D4172; ASTM D2783 or application-specific gear/EP test | Characterises anti-wear or extreme-pressure performance for product qualification and comparative investigation. | For scar diameter: poor anti-wear response, contamination or depleted/additive-incompatible oil. | For scar diameter: stronger film/additive response; results do not directly predict a specific machine's wear rate. |
| Evaporation loss / volatility | ASTM D5800 or product-specific volatility method | Indicates tendency to lose light fractions, increase oil consumption and change viscosity at temperature. | Volatile base oil, fuel dilution, wrong product or severe thermal exposure history. | Lower-volatility formulation; heavy contamination or oxidation can also suppress apparent volatility. |
Five-step evidence analysis.
Move from a trustworthy sample to a tested failure hypothesis, proportionate maintenance response and documented confirmation. Each step increases or reduces diagnostic confidence.
Choose a representative sampling procedure →- 01Validate the evidence: confirm asset identity, a repeatable live-zone sampling point, operating state, oil hours, make-up volume and recent maintenance for food and beverage processing. Repeat the sample when identity, container, flushing or handling is doubtful.
- 02Establish the correct baseline: confirm the declared food-grade lubricant grade, base chemistry and additive profile. Compare method-consistent results with new oil, the previous stable sample and rate of change rather than a universal limit.
- 03Build the contamination pattern: Evaluate water, cleaning chemicals, process material and non-food-grade mixing within hygiene controls. Require an independent companion signal, inspection finding or filter observation before assigning a source.
- 04Test and localise the failure hypothesis: Correlate degradation and wear evidence with seals, bearings, gearboxes and sanitation exposure. Check whether the proposed mechanism explains the full pattern, including contradictory or absent evidence.
- 05Select and verify proportionate action: Correct segregation or ingress, involve food-safety and maintenance teams and document the verified return to control. Record the intervention, resample at a risk-based interval from the same point and confirm that the trend responded as expected.